The Mysterious Non-Firing Glock 17R

The impossible-to-own-legally Glock 18 and the we-can’t-have-nice-things-because-of-our-stupid-import-laws Glock 25 are the two guns most Glock collectors will never have in their collections. Next on the list is perhaps Glock’s 17R, with the “R” referring to the automatic trigger Reset. This allows the shooter to practice dry firing on a gun that can’t actually shoot a live round. Sounds great, but I’ve learned that the 17R isn’t quite the training pistol nirvana that it’s cracked up to be.

On paper, everything looks perfect. The gun’s polymer frame is cast in fire engine red, as are the base plates for the magazines, so nobody will mistake this for a real gun. The barrel is solid, and with a large hole drilled in the side of it (just in front of the chamber) to eliminate any confusion. There is no firing pin, and the breech face isn’t drilled for one. The slide is marked with a big WARNING noting that the gun is a “practice sample.” And the trigger mechanism, of course, does not require that the slide be cycled for a trigger reset; just releasing the trigger is enough.

The completely non-operational barrel of the Glock 17R. So far, so good.

Curiously, this non-firing gun still has to transfer as a firearm (translation: I had it shipped to my local FFL and I had to fill out a 4473 before receiving it) because the receiver is functionally identical to a real Glock receiver, meaning that the slide can be swapped out to make it a fully functioning firearm. I can see the appeal of this to the Cerakote junkies; this also stresses the importance of checking and clearing every firearm, every time, even if you think it shouldn’t actually be able to shoot. It’s worth noting that I can buy a SIRT (which cannot be easily turned into a working firearm) and have it shipped to my door step; more on that in a bit.

To my eye the Glock 17R magazines are identical (beyond the red floor plate) to regular Glock magazines, and on my last range visit I confirmed that they will function perfectly in a fully firing Glock.

I understand that Glock wanted to make a training product that resembles the real thing, and they succeeded precisely because the frame of this gun is the real thing. Whether that’s a problem is largely a function of how its owner treats it (and perhaps this is why Glock doesn’t want these getting out into the consumer wilds?), but it seems like it would have made more sense to do something to the frame that couldn’t be converted into a working gun so easily.

The trigger spring of the Glock 17R is clearly unique. The housing and connector appear to be otherwise stock parts.

The 17R has a different problem, though, and one that will be a hit harder to correct: the trigger. Glock doesn’t appear to list the 17R on their new website (they do list the law-enforcement-only 17 cutaway and the 17 FX/FOF pistols that shoot training ammunition), but the internet doesn’t lie and their old website claimed a 5.5 pound trigger. On my scale it came out to a hefty 6 pounds 8 ounces, which wades a bit closer to New York trigger territory than most people might want. And the trigger spring doesn’t look like any Glock trigger spring that I’ve ever seen; a flip through the armorer’s manual confirms that it’s unique to the 17R. It’s possible that the connector could be swapped out to lighten things a bit, but this limitation makes the 17R a bit more “take it or leave it” than many people might like.

The trigger break and reset are good enough, but they don’t mimic an actual Glock 17 nearly as well as some other competitors. And that’s a shame, because the one thing Glock should do well on their own training pistol is to simulate their own action.

All of this said … I have found the 17R to be an excellent platform for practicing with the MantisX, which is absolutely wonderful for dry-fire training (I love the MantisX so much that I’ll be doing another blog post on it shortly). In fact, the MantisX combined with a SIRT may become the best non-firing training platform in existence.

Interestingly, Glock no longer lists the 19R on their website. I’ll ask at the next armorer’s class whether it has been discontinued or not, and if there are any plans to offer reduced weight trigger springs. My guess is “yes” and “no.” And in terms of this 17R, this makes it more of a gun collecting curiosity than a serious training tool.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.